Skip to content

Conversation

DimplesY
Copy link

@DimplesY DimplesY commented Oct 14, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the Next.js integration guide to use named route handlers (GET, POST) with a locally scoped app instance, improving clarity on how to expose handlers.
    • Examples now align with current Next.js conventions, making it easier to adopt and follow best practices.
    • Clarifies the public export pattern to reduce confusion for readers and ease migration from older examples.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Walkthrough

Refactors the Next.js integration docs code sample: replaces a default export of a new Elysia instance with a locally scoped const app. Continues to define routes on app and exposes GET and POST via app.fetch as named exports, changing the module’s export surface.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs — Next.js integration snippet
docs/integrations/nextjs.md
Updated sample to use const app = new Elysia({ prefix: '/user' }) instead of a default export. Retains route chaining on app. Exposes export const GET = app.fetch and export const POST = app.fetch, shifting from default export to named exports tied to app.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nibbled the docs with a careful hop,
Swapped defaults for names—clean little crop.
app sits proud, its routes in tow,
GET and POST fetch, ready to go.
In the garden of code, I twitch my nose—
Small change, neat rows, where clarity grows.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title clearly indicates that the pull request updates the Next.js integration documentation, which aligns directly with the change to the docs/integrations/nextjs.md file; it is concise, specific, and uses a conventional “docs:” prefix without extraneous details.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d2186d and b1db5ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/integrations/nextjs.md (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant